Are you comfortable with a woman as the primary breadwinner?
Live Poll
Are you comfortable with a woman as the primary breadwinner?
Are you comfortable with a woman as the primary breadwinner?
VoteTotal Votes: 8571
I'd love to be a love slave for some beautiful woman with $$$.
I've have an apartment out back with a buzzer/flashing light when
"service" is required!
There would be a monthly retainer plus choice of Ferrari or Aston-Martin.
We'd need a van for "on the spot" service. hehe!
Spot "off" Landon. Most committed guys don't want that in a woman either.
Has anyone run across this? One thing that is straining some of our neighbors is situations where:
I've never heard of that issue before, but it is one at 2 of my neighbors households and I was wondering if anyone else has run across that, or if it is an anomaly.
Cdahl. . . I think what you are witnessing is how we are hardwired. Let me make a cavet so I do not get angry responses and say that I believe that women should have the same earning power as men etc. . .but I do think that as men are more agressive and logical women tend to be more nurturing and emotional (in general). So I believe that as humans men are more hardwired to be the "hunter/gather" type person. It will be interesting to watch the battle between social evolution vs how we are made. There will be a tension no doubt. I don't think it is an evil thing or bad but knowing what we are up against will help in the battle. My wife and I are more traditional. I worked and she stayed home with the kids until they were both in school. Now she has gone back to work but does not make as much as I do. . .and that is okay because we just save her check because we learned to live on one income. I think the traditional role just seems to satisfy US more. . . but the traditional role is not for everyone but it keeps our tension level very low and that is worth much more than any amount of pay!
cdahl - My husband and I have never had this issue. We have both always assumed we would need to work as long as we were physically able. If we get to retire and never work again, so be it, but the assumption has always been there that we'd need to do something.
So no conversation like this has gone on in our household. DH still has a job and I still make way more than he does, and I have always known that I cannot quit working. We'd lose easily 75% of our income and I don't want that.
It does make me wonder though what those wives (your neighbors) do for work, and that maybe, when things improve, they should look into doing a job they enjoy. I doubt very seriously that anyone would be miffed about working to 65 if they truly enjoyed what they did.
Yvonnemari,
Good point. We tried to discuss the enjoyment of the job, but the disconnect seems to come with the missing of daily growing up of the children. My wife stays at home and it was a huge sacrifice for us economically, as she made more than I did at the time. I left the decision complete to her and we made the necessary adjustments when she quit.
I think her friends are saddened because they miss the daily growth of their children at the park, the funny things they say all day, (all of our kids are between 2 and 5).
Of course, on the flip side we don't get all of the fancy things they do either. But to each their own. We recognize both sides and naturally there is a sacrifice one way or the other. I guess it boils down to the personalities and social make up of each family.
If you ever find this sort of setup, you be sure and let us all know...
Cdahl,
I am a stay at home dad by surprise and it has been great. While we have not had the issues you discribe, I can tell every once and a while my wife gets a little jealose. It usually only takes a long weekend though and she is rerady to go back to the office. Raising kids is the hardest "job" I have ever had, they drain you.
Honey, if I'm beautiful and have all that money, what do I need YOU for?
LOLOLOL
Brandon........you beat me to it.......I was going to say that!
Of course, why not?
There should be another catagory. My husband and I earn close to the same $ amount, but I have higher take home pay for several reasons. He and I have our own accounts and split the bills. If he needs cash he asks if I can spot him. I don't have a problem with this arrangement, but I would not be comfortable if he did not work and I had to support the family/household alone.
How do you take home more than him if you earn the same? Is he picking up all the benefits / 401K payments, and you get the W-4 deductions?
It's not just that there should be another category, but that the categories that are there, don't match the question at all. If the question is "Are you comfortable with a woman as the primary breadwinner?" Then the answer's should be Yes, No, Other.
The answers to this poll try to ascertain WHY your answer (only) yes or no. This invalidates the poll results.
Someone who answers yes or no, but not for any of the reasons stated is not represented. Get your act together Newsvine. This is too common a problem not to address.
How do you take home more than him if you earn the same? Is he picking up all the benefits / 401K payments, and you get the W-4 deductions?
If one partner is self-employed, he/she will generally owe more taxes. He or she will also have more business expenses, though some of those will be deductible (which means more money will be seen come next April, but less in the meantime).
Also, some jobs don't offer sick leave or vacation time (no such thing for the self-employed). Some people get paid under the table. Some are salaried, and get no overtime.
I always find these studies and article amusing, because my parents were living this life going back to the 1950's!! Because my dad was a teacher, we had the same schedule, so until he died when I was 13, he was my primary caregiver. he was the one who made me breakfast, and during the week made dinner. He was around when I got home from school and was there for all the 'mom' things, like the doctor and stuff. He cleaned the house. My mom did the laundry, and baked, but the kitchen BELONGED to my dad.
I also find it amusing that you still have women who will claim it's ok, until THEY are confronted with this kind of situation. and there is STILL a tremendous bias on the part of most women about marrying DOWN.
i think the whole deal is that a lot of jobs traditionally held by men, have either been combined with other jobs to produce jobs with a new title,eliminated totally. or offshored .
its a drag but males particularly white males have been preyed upon in these ways.
president eishower had the right idea in the 50s when he organized operation wetback to get rid of illegal resident living here
they rounded em up and shipped em out the mexicans went by train to the middle of mexico before they were allowed off the train
i guess its not got thru everyones head that illegal aliens are forcing thousnads of hospitals to go bankrupt with non reimbursed care . no wonder medical costs have gone so high the paying people have to take on part of the uncompensated burden the hospital finds themselves under
if this health care bill passes there will be thousands if not millions or illegals on the program using fake documents for the same thing they use them for now to get state and federala benefits
theres a fmaily down the street from my mom and dad whose daughter are mor or less baby mills. one got smart and moved to california where she lives in relative comfort another drain on the bankrupt state of mexifornia
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=103163§ionid=3510303
According to the most recent Census (July 1, 2007), 45.4 million Americans are of Hispanic descent and form the second largest ethnic group in the United States today. It might be mentioned that in compiling the statistics, the largest group (non-Hispanic Whites) did not represent a single group, but was comprised of dozens of subgroups. If those subgroups had been counted separately - rather than lumped together - Hispanic Americans would have far outnumbered any other ethnic group.
In some parts of the country, the Hispanics outnumber other groups by such wide margins it would be highly misleading to classify them as a “minority”. For example, 97 percent of the population of East Los Angeles is Hispanic and in the Texas towns of Laredo and Brownsville, Latinos make up 94 percent and 91 percent of the populations, respectively.
Another indication of the growing number of Hispanic Americans is the fact that they are no longer concentrated in the Southwest and Florida alone, but can be found throughout the United States. In the past decade, the US Hispanic population has grown by 60 percent, and despite the economic downturn, immigration - legal and otherwise - from Latin America remains strong. According to US government projections, by the year 2050, Hispanics in the United States will number 100 million. A 2007 American Community Survey conducted by the United States Census Bureau found that 34 million Americans speak Spanish as their first language. Officials estimate that within fifty years, half of the US population will call Spanish their mother tongue.
Statistics across the board indicate that the US Hispanic population is alive and growing and - if present trends continue - will soon change the demographic face of America; but what does that mean for the United States?
Well, the appointment of Sonia Sotomayor to the US Supreme Court can be considered an indication of things to come. Increasing number of Latinos will most likely be appointed to - and elected for - positions of power as the Hispanic constituency waxes stronger and makes its voice heard.
Then there is policy; US policy both at home and abroad will most likely undergo radical changes in the near future, as US lawmakers will have to appease - and answer to - the growing numbers of Hispanic voters. An example of future trends can be seen in the demands made by powerful Hispanic lobbyists and the adjustments Washington is already making in its policy towards Cuba.
Suffice it to say, that the Anglo-Saxon culture of the United States no longer applies to the greater population. The American people no longer “fit the mold”. As the demographic map of the United States changes, its culture - and values - will, of necessity have to adapt, as well, with the predominant culture belonging to the largest ethnic group. The final product, of course, will most likely be a cultural mosaic; but it will be definitely tilted towards the largest ethnic group. That will be the reconquest of America.
as you can seee the white caucsan sub groups are the true minorities now and there rights are being trmpled every day that goes by
ii guess your willing to let illegals continue to murder rape steal identies and otherwise violate "the laws on the books that dhs secretary napalatano has been saying on tv shes going to see are enforced and then turns around and changes 287 g so they they arent on the books any more real nice !!!!!!!!!!!1
New Policy May Threaten Public Safety. The Obama administration’s new 287(g) directives could potentially harm public safety. In accordance with statutory law, any illegal alien can be charged with immigration violations via 287(g). But under the new directive, an illegal alien will be required to be arrested for or convicted of killing, raping, robbing, and/or kidnapping someone, or be arrested/convicted for a major drug offense, before his removal becomes a high, “Level 1” priority on the administration’s new three-level priority scheme. The MOA provides for ICE to take custody of some low-priority aliens, but the decision to move forward with processing for such a removal will be made by ICE on a case-by-case basis, presumably depending on detention space, but also potentially subject to the administration’s politically driven enforcement policies.
Although the new SOP definitively makes some illegal aliens low priorities, it remains somewhat unclear what the Obama administration considers a “minor offense” unworthy of deportation. Is identity theft enough to warrant deportation? What about driving without a license or drunk driving? Must an innocent motorist be killed before law enforcement can act on such crimes? An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
Take, for example, Alfredo Ramos, an illegal alien from Mexico who killed 16-year-old Tessa Tranchant and 17-year-old Alison Kundhardt in Virginia Beach, Va. On March 30, 2007, the girls were stopped at an intersection, waiting for the light to turn green when a drunk Ramos slammed his vehicle into theirs at 70 mph, killing both of them. Two months previously, Ramos had been arrested for identity theft, public drunkenness, and DUI. In an ideal world, the earlier crimes would have set off red flags and resulted in deportation, preventing the tragedy. This would have required a commitment by both the local jurisdiction and the federal authorities to remove low-level offenders like Ramos, of course. But the Obama administration has decided against such a commitment: Under the new MOA, ICE would likely direct local law enforcement to release similarly-situated aliens, and lives would not be spared. Instead of crafting a more pro-active MOA, the Obama administration seems to have taken a step backward.
Take as another example Lidia Monica Lopez, an illegal alien from Mexico living in North Carolina. On July 11, 2008, she was pulled over and cited for operating a vehicle without a license. That was her only additional offense, and she was not processed for removal under 287(g). Less than a year later, on April 5, 2009, Lopez slammed into on-coming traffic (it is alleged she ran a red light) injuring Pamela Coble, aged 60, and then struck and killed motorcyclist William Bryan Barber, Sr. His nine-year-old son, William Jr., was also knocked from the motorcycle and injured. Instead of trying to prevent this from happening to someone else, the new DHS directive arguably encourages the same result: prior to the killing, Lopez would not be considered a Level 1 or Level 2 priority.
DHS will now find reason to deport Ramos and Lopez, but why should people have to die before our government enforces the law? Both individuals should have at least been charged with immigration violations if not actually detained and removed during their first interaction with law enforcement. But even with an active local law enforcement agency that is robustly participating in a 287(g) program and reporting illegal aliens to ICE, the new MOA and the Obama administration’s apparent lack of interest in detaining a larger share of illegal aliens seems to make the possibility of deporting aliens like Ramos and Lopez before they kill unlikely.
The new SOP that accompanies the MOA uses a three-level priority list for criminal aliens, but exactly how it will operate remains unclear. It appears that DHS will focus its detention efforts largely on “Level 1” aliens and will make other illegal aliens a low priority until they commit a serious crime. While ICE has used a similar prioritization scheme for its internal operations, this is the first time an administration has required local agencies participating in 287(g) to adopt such a scheme. Here are the three priorities:
* Level 1: Criminal aliens who have been convicted of or arrested for major drug offenses and/or violent offenses such as murder, manslaughter, rape, robbery, and kidnapping.
* Level 2: Criminal aliens who have been convicted of or arrested for minor drug offenses and/or mainly property offenses such as burglary, larceny, fraud, and money laundering.
Level 3: Criminal aliens who have been convict
id like to know why non hispanic caucasion american sub groups
minority status is not being protected the same as illegal mexicans and aliens
I find it amazing that "geniuses" like yourself manage to connect ANY subject matter to illegal immigration.
Ted,
I'm a Hispanic living outside of the American Southwest. I've never robbed, raped, murdered, nor stolen an identity. My son is in college on a COMPETITIVE full ride academic scholarship, my daughter is an award winning musician and all A middle school student. Where do we fit into your America? By the way, my salary is on the low six figures, and my wife makes more that me.
Great googly-moogly that's a whole lot of crazy going on up there! What a dark and sad outlook on life. I think ted needs a hug, just not from me.
God Bless you Ted! Glad to see someone realizes the truth.
Sounds more like Ted's own weird version of the "truth" to me...
Yeah, I'm guessing Ted's got something to say (English is my first language and I'll be dam**d if I know what he's actually getting at (other than he might be getting his American Census information from Iranian Press TV (???))
I found, though, that there are families like mine that can and have "broken the mold" completely, but we do it be being strong in relationships - with each other, with other human beings, all around.
I am more of the logical type (AND emotional now after having our daughter). I am WAY more aggressive than my husband in as far as - I grew up poor - I don't want to be poor anymore - so I work hard, talk straight, treat a CEO like a Gardener and a Gardener like a CEO ... in other words, all the same.
I think this translates well into the business world - as it's enabled me to achieve a career where I'm making $70k+ on just a high school diploma.
I guess if more families have an "A Type" personality like me in their dynamic... and if they encourage that growth and ambition (and if the person is loved and appreciated), it's not going to matter who brings home the bacon.
My husband calls me his sugar momma... and I call him my "drrrrrope dade sexy mahn" (Scottish accent). He cooks, does the housework, goes to school and gets the kid ready for school. I bring home the money, put our daughter to bed and take her to the park and give him come hither looks to make him feel wanted - and tell him I appreciate everything he does to take care of us.
He still loves football, cars and Axis and Allies. I was never very high maintenance girlie, but he lets me have the TV on Saturday for Husker games and Romantic comedies (Sunday is for NFL).
So... the only time this really matters is if the parties involved cannot overcome NATURE to actually NURTURE their loved ones and careers at the same time.
Americans have blamed immigrants for every work woe for a long time. The Irish were blamed in the 1800's, the asians in the early twentieth century, then Mexicans. Get over it.
Funny you are using the discussion about women in the work force and the changing family to spout yout racism. I know it may be hard for a moron like you but try to stay on topic. Next time you think you have a thought just let it go, it is likely just gas. Definitely large amounts of hot air.
Great read Ted and it hits the mark DEAD ON!!! Legalize or get the HELL out!!
Randy,
Dont you mean one of those full MINORITY give away SCHOLORSHIPS!! And good luck on finding a Musician JOB for the daughter!! If you were born here or went through the right process to become LEGAL and pay your TAXES than thats OK but if you didnt and are taking advantage of the system like most HISPANICS than you to need to GET THE HELL OUT!! Nothing like a GOOD RECESSION to send them back to GOOD OL MEKICO!! Thats about the only good thing coming out of it,the sceneary around my house and town is much better LOL!!
PTOWN,
Nevermind what that loser BILLJOY says you can spout your RACISM anytime you want to I LOVE IT!! BILL JOY is probably a CALIFORNIA LIBERAL PETERPUFFER and is whats wrong with this Great Country now a days!! Let one of those illegals take his job and see if he doesnt sing a different tune. Illegals and the DNC UNIONS UAW are to blame for the topic on hand you libs are just to STUPID to ADMIT IT!! It is an example of how GREEDY OVERPAYED and UNDERWORKED Westerners and Northeasterners have run businesses overseas!! EVER wondered why those areas in our country are the ones STRUGGLING the most!! You know I dont have to tell you! An OVER-INFLATED STANDARD OF LIVING(I love those words) has been bankrupting this country for decades and at least since they have been inflating phony (aka taxes and property values) money year after year it just couldnt and cant be sustained..Why are people moving out of the northeast and out west quicker than you can say DEFEAT IN 2010 and 2012!!
I think you got off the point and topic here. Try and stay on the topic
I know Dancingeagle and for that I am sorry!! But I am trying to wrap all this into a cause and effect syndrome and it does make since it just took 20 or 25 years or more to get us to this point..On the topic Me and my wife make about the same but I would not have a problem with her being my LIL SUGA MOMMA LOL! We have been PAYING OFF DEBT and SAVING MORE and I think that is another great thing about this recession it has brought people down to EARTH into reality world. I LOVE MY COUNTRY but what a SAD shape we are in..
If ignorance were a commodity, you would be the richest man in America. I've got news for you -- some of "them" were actually born here! And not just born here because Mommy came across the border at the right time but because she herself was born here. And even again, because her Mom was born here as well! Shocking, isn't it? Take my hubby. His ancestors didn't have to do anything at all. They were just minding their own business when one day, in the late 1800s, the white man came along and said, your area is now part of the United States. Instant citizenship! So, if you want to really get rid of all the Hispanics, then you need to ditch pretty much all of the southern states as well as many of the Rocky mountain ones, as well. Good luck with that.
Oh, won't someone please think about the forlorn, down-trodden white males in America! We should hold a telethon or something.
Sorry Miguel, Obama's in office now. You'll have to wait AT LEAST 3 more years until it's your turn. LOL
Scole,
Randy said full Academic scholarship and you know it. Why do people like you need to drag discussions like this into the mud. That was straight racist BS and it has no place in our society. Further the arts(music) are the heart of any civilization and I applaud your daughters strength Randy.
Hey, Rush -
Why don't you just use your real name? You're not doing a very good job of hiding your real identity...
Scole,
Sorry it took so long to get back after your thoughtful response. Apparently you turned off your considerable comprehension skills when you saw the word Hispanic, so let me state again...COMPETITIVE scholarship. It means he received the award based on his academic achievements. As for my daughter, perhaps she won't have a job in music, but did you notice that I also wrote that she is a all A student? She'll be fine. By the way, I was born in Pontiac, Michigan and I'm not going anywhere. If you're so afraid of brown people, maybe you should be the one to get the hell out.
First of all what a flawed poll. None of the above was not even an option. I couldnt relate to any of the options.I am not supprised at the survey. After all it is still part of the a the American feminan superiority syndrome. I am a service person, and I go into families homes everyday. I see what goes on not in public. The young chicks are all living with dead beats. they have kids from a minimum of 2 guys.the dead beats are on the couch playing vidio games and she getting ready for work. If she a woman she get preferencial scholorships. If she has a kid or get a divorce, they give her a scholorship.
What bothers me the most is when I am in the parents house, the wife is constantly verbly beating down the husband. Ya know what women said the men did to them? You could never fix that sink! you could'nt put a hammer and nail together! You better leave the fixing to the professionals! My husband wanted to fix it, But I knew he would only screw it up. I hear this everyday in peoples houses and wish i could just slap the shi## out of the bitch. I have said this for years that the men are so brow beaten and imacsilated they can't even function.
I get so sick and tired af listening about how women are so tired and over worked. They do it to thmselves. Nobody in the house can do anything right but them.They wont let anybody else do anything.My and many other mothers made us do laundry, dishes. clean our own rooms,take out the garbage, and prepare meal on occcation..No mater if you were male or female. Not todays woman. She has to be in conrol of everthing. Because control is everything. Her mother controlled everything.
I have had several women work for me. I was glad to have them. They were actually more teachable and more reliable than the men. But I know this is a direct result of the difference of the way men and women are treated in this society. As a father men are taught that they are irrellevent to the family.As a child a boy is taught he has value as a child. But at what age do you tell a child he is irrellevent? And is expected to live the rest of his life with that premise. Just look at the difference how John and Kate are treated. She can do no wrong and he can do no right, so why even try?
I'm surprised that such a hard worker as yourself has enough spare time to survey the number of women it would take to confidently keep using "they" and "them" as an entire group. If I were to make my own egregious assumptions I would say I am also surprised such a blue collar guy is watching John and Kate Plus 8 or anything on TLC for that matter. How very enlightened of you. Of course your desire to hit women reduces that enlightenment a bit, but they deserve it, right?
Just a reminder, Neil (although, I don't like the "breeders" either)... the protections were originally put in place because NO ONE would give women a chance at education... just like other minorities.
Now, if you want that changed (or adjusted to the times - which I would agree with you there) - contact your congressman, your senator, your president.
If you don't like how you see one human being treating another, say something. If you don't think it's your place, put yourself in a place that MAKES it ok to say something.
And Neil... in public, I'm the talker, but my husband is still the boss at home. I submit to him in the home, even though I'm the dominant personality... because I do believe, at least for us, that dynamic works.
It makes me feel like I don't HAVE to be in control... he can make the decisions, he chooses what we have for dinner, what we see at the theater, but NOT all people are built the same.
I would recommend you have a long discussion with whatever woman has treated you this way, because it's skewing your view of the opposite sex. If it's a woman that is dead now, that's harder, but you can still try to just forgive or forget (or neither) but move on.
People are all different, within any given "grouping".
Be happy, Neil. It's infectious.
Neil, you forgot that women are also smarter than men. I learned that in my sophomore year of high school. As freshmen, they were as bad as the boys, but the next year, they were twice as mature and three times as smart. From then on, they left the boys further and further behind. I have nothing against Obama, but I wanted Hillary to win just to see how good this country could be with a woman running it.
My wife is smarter than me, and I have no trouble at all admitting it. I am extremely proud of all she's accomplished (I'm 59 this month, and she's 57). She has her own business license for a home-based artistic painting business. She started with a painting instructor, but when she got better than the instructor, she went out on her own. For her day job, however, she works in a hospital, in MRI. Before that, she was in x-ray. She became supervisor of x-ray, then made the jump to MRI without any schooling, just OJT. She's going for her MRI license next month. The test looks scary to me, but she'll ace it, she always does. No matter where she's worked all her life (including before me) she has risen to the top. That is, as high as she's wanted to go, because if she went any higher in a hospital, you get into straight administrative stuff, and no more actual hands on floor work. She doesn't want that, and neither do the Radiologists who read the MRI scans. Many times they ask for her input when they're reading them. They used to do the same in x-ray when she was there. About ten years ago, I was in the hospital with a blood clot to the brain. There were seven doctors treating me, and I should have died or become a vegetable. They didn't confer with me, they went to her, and then she put it in my language and we decided what I should do. I know at least half of the doctors on a personal level, and they know they had it made with me, because they could speak their doctor-speak to my wife and she could understand them. Guess you could say I literally placed my life in her hands!
MRI is all computer controlled, the MRI tech controls the computer. I've been into computers since the DOS age, so I know my stuff. She never had until joining MRI. She always told me, if anything ever happens to me, please leave instructions, cause she had no idea what I did. Well, I've gone to work with her now and seen her in action in the MRI control room. She said, "What do you think of this program?" I said, "How do you even know what you're doing? My God, I don't even know what these words mean!" I don't think I could learn this in a four year course, and she learned it in OJT! Next to her, I'm as dumb as a rock. Need I mention that she earns over three times what I ever did?
As much as I rave about her, she's not unique. A few years ago, I had a problem with the Social Security Agency, and had to deal with the local office. I spent months wasting my time with three different men who couldn't solve the problem. Talk about dumb as a rock, one of them couldn't count double digits, and one didn't know how to send a successful email (one that didn't get lost or bounce back as 'undeliverable') Then I got to talk to a woman (on the phone, no less), and the problem was solved with that one call! I told my wife that I've learned that, no matter what the business, if you need something done, quickly and efficiently, seek out the woman. Whatever you need, it will get done!
reminds me of a sign I saw in an office once:
WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK TO THE MAN IN CHARGE
OR THE WOMAN WHO KNOWS WHAT'S GOING ON?
I've seen that, mtpromises. It's supposed to be funny, but it's SOOOOO true!
I don't see the point in having an opinion. Men don't aren't aloud to have much of any say in what women do anymore. So what's the point? Women today do whatever they want. Young women will expect that they can do whatever they want. It's a sad country we live in.
Do you think it's because you can't spell "allowed"? The truth is that more & more, women are better educated than men.
We can & will do whatever we want. I definitely don't need a man to support me. I have 2 houses, go on vacation when & where I want to, go to weekly massages. You only think it's a sad country because men are no longer "kings of the castle".
If by men having no much say in what women want you mean that society has progressed in most places to the point where women are not chattle, then yes you are correct.
Men are not better then women nor vice versa. Neither side should have a say in what a fully functional adult is allowed to do.
Men are not better than women. They are equal with respect to value as a person. However, they are different and have different roles. The man's role is to be the provider and protector of the household. He is ultimately responsible for the well-being of the family. The wife is to submit to his leadership and fill in where he lacks. Society thinks that being submissive means you're less valuable. To the contrary, it often takes a greater person to submit and serve. Equal, but different. There is a natural order of things. There must be a hierarchy, and the man is the final authority.
First you have to be educated and know how to spell... ALLOWED.
Holy Christ. I didn't know there were still people who though this way.
Humans don't have pre-destined roles. Humans are governed by thought and will, not instinct.
There may be a natural order of things in the animal kingdom (and yes, I realize that we are all animals), but the moment you introduce intellect into the equation, the natural order of things goes out the window.
Are you kidding? You seriously thinks it's sad because women have choices? omg. I hope you don't have a daughter and never do.
Yes, there are people who still think this way. I wish there were more. Then, perhaps American society would not be going down the poopchute.
Perhaps the so-called "intellect" being introduced into the equation is faulty. The result of building society upon faulty intellect rather than established norms is kids who don't know who they are, what they're doing, or where they're going in life.
The intellect isn't faulty. The intellect simply is. But if you have "established norms" for men and women, you stunt the intellect and individuality.
Maybe Amelia Earhart and Marie Curie should have stayed at home in their naturally submissive roles to their husband's final authority.
You can't take a brilliant female mind or a vibrant female spirit and say "It is your pre-destined place to serve some man." You're trying to cram a square peg into a round hole. It wouldn't work for either party.
Also, kids having no idea where they're going is a product of trying to make kids what we want them to be instead of guiding them along the paths that best suit them. Pre-set societal norms are backward and archaic.
Unless you're talking about India's caste system or the Amish. Then it works just fine.
Are you kidding me? My husband and I have a loving and equal relationship based on respect. We both work and bring home the money. We both nuture our children. We discuss everything, the money brought into this house is OUR money not his or hers. We have 2 daughters and 1 son and we are teaching them to be outgoing, responsible, hardworking, compassionate and reasonable individuals.
It doesn't matter who makes more money. I doesn't matter who nurtures the children. The children are a combination of two people then two people should take on the care and love of these children. There is nothing wrong with society in this manner. Only knuckle draggers fail to see that what they think is flawed!
@krowdykutz
You're delusional. Men are not the "final authority". Should the one with the higher education make the final decision? I think that makes sense. Women are earning the majority of both 4 year and post-graduate degrees. I'm sorry to tell you that you now find yourself in a society where WOMEN have the final say.
Oh, sure - there may be some under-educated women that cling to your vision of how things work, but those of us with educated brains understand that WE have the power. Sorry I had to break it to ya.
I don't think it has anything to do with education. It has to do with structure. Absolutely both men and women should bring all knowledge to the table based on education, and absolutely both parents should take an active role in raising their kids. But at the end of the day, there needs to be one person, i.e. the male, who make the final decision and who ultimately bears the responsibility, whether the outcome is positive or negative. That is authority. Look at government as an example. The president is the final authority. He makes the decision and bears the responsibility, no matter what the outcome. His team of advisers are for more knowledgeable than him and bring a lot of good information to the discussion. But after all is said and done, he makes the tough choices, and everyone else needs to support that decision. So should it be in the family, with the husband as the leader. The wife is just as critical to the family as the husband, but the husband is the authority.
Women better start serving a man or they will be alone and miserable and old. Women have no right to think they can just come and go as they please. Some are starting careers and some are even getting into politics making decisions that effect men. I don't like it one bit.
FYI, so people don't think I'm a woman-hater...
I consider a stay-at-home mom to be a full-time job, which is more difficult work in a lot of cases than going to the office for a 9 to 5. I have incredible respect for women who are able to effectively manage their homes and raise kids. Men do not have that ability.
Furthermore, I submit that a stay-at-home mom earns her keep just as much as dad does at the office. Just because dad has his name on the paycheck doesn't mean that mom doesn't work equally hard and shouldn't share equally in the bank account. Props to all stay-at-home moms who work their tails off to turn a house into a happy home.
Actually, I dig your 3rd post. That lends a lot of clarity to your original statement.
Have a great evening.
The Pig King is exactly what he calls himself, but I think krowdykutz got a little misunderstood. I understand what he's getting at, but that idea about structure is flawed now. What btone mentioned about the animal kingdom and that we were part of it was close to the argument. When we were cavemen and women, yes, the tough and hardy men were the hunter/gatherers, and the women took care of the kids/cave/meals/fire, all the 'home' stuff. It was the way it had to be to survive in that world. But we don't live in caves anymore (some of us, at least) and we don't have to do the things they did to survive. (Now be honest guys, when was the last time you had to fight off a sabretoothed tiger, or bring down a mastadon to feed the clan?) We go to the supermarket and buy our meat, now. How difficult and dangerous is that? Why it's so easy, the kids can go along. Like the old TV commercial said, the woman can bring home the bacon AND fry it up in a pan. And a lot better than a guy can, in many cases. It's not threatening, guys, it's progress.
There is one small point, however. I've had over the course of my lifetime, like most people, jobs that I've hated, bosses that I've hated working for, but had to work to live until something better came along. The only thing that bothers me, and should bother any REAL men, is a situation where the woman HAS to go into the workplace, such as because of this economy, potentially to a job or a boss like that. I just feel that it shouldn't happen to a woman, but that's just me.
Should the one with the higher education make the final decision?
Princess,
Not necessarily. If a man has a masters in music and his high school graduate wife has been in banking for 15 years, I would probably trust her with the purse strings.
Two of my best salesman have high school eds. They make a boatload of bread, and their decision making is some of the soundest I've ever seen.
Education isn't everything.
EEWW! after cooking and cleaning, will I be required to do OTHER duties???
Again I stand by my statement that a marriage and by way of that a family is a joint, equal partnership. No one person should make the decisions by themselves. My husband and I are both responsible for the decisions we make together. Just because he is a man doesn't mean that he should be the one responsible for the decision making. Men don't have all the answers, they are only one half of a whole!
I agree with neil to an extent, this poll has no "none of the above", or an "it doesn't matter to me" option. In my opinion, both husbands and wives should treat each other as equals.
Agreed. None of the answers applies to me. My wife works, but I make WAY more money than she does.
However, it wouldn't matter to me a second if she made more than me...if fact, I think it would be great!
How small and unhappy a person must be to be jealous of the one you love because they bring more money than you into the COLLECTIVE household fund?
If you measure your success based on dollars made, I afraid most of you, men and women, are going to be sorely dissappointed with your life.
Well, I certainly am happy with my successful career. I don't have a horse in this race because I am single, but one reason that I am single is that more than a couple of men that I dated along the way were either jealous of or felt threatened by my personal success (including personal financial success.) This reminded me of something my parents talked to "the girls," about which was, "if you have more than he does, eventually he will wander or resent the circumstances... feeling threatened is the 'thin ego' male..." I found this so true. Alas, I've enjoyed being successful AND single, ahhhhhhhhhhhh (blissful!!!)
I've mocked the people on the opposite side of the fence so I only feel it's fair to make note that it's a mistake--whether your parents told you or you came to the belief through anecdotal evidence--to make sweeping statements on either gender. Perhaps you just need to meet a better caliber of men. As noted below I'd have no problem with it. And though I make more than my wife so you could say "well, you don't know" I've got friends whose spouses make more than them and they're completely happy with the situation. Perhaps defensive ego driven dolts group up and confident men group up. I won't press my relationship views on you, if you're happy being single keep single (I've got buddies in that catagory as well) but if you're still game to find a mate just know men who look beyond paychecks to exist.
Exactly. This is especially true when your income hits the 6 figure mark. Your dating pool is reduced substantially - both because if you're making $200K, you don't want to date someone who's only making $60K - because that's too unevenly yoked. Conversely, they don't want to date you - unless they're hoping to take advantage of the situation.
I don't get it. If you're making 200K, why wouldn't you want to date someone making 60K? If he's got the personality or the intellect or whatever, does his W2 really make that much of a difference?
There should be an additional category at the top that says "Don't care. My wife's / husband's take home doesn't change the person or the relationship."
Wow, Savage Princess...that post says a lot about you. Pigeon hole people much? With that attitude, I'm not so sure money is the "why" you see the dating pool shrinking.
It doesn't matter how much my husband makes, it's him I fell in love with! It's who he is not what he makes that makes me love him more everyday! Even after 17 years I can honestly say that I feel the same way about him today as I did the day we married and then some!
Hold tight, DSW. I was an advertising exec making 6-figures when I met my husband, around 10 years ago...at which point he made less than half of my salary...which didn't matter at all, to either of us. He loved/loves me for who I am and he has confidence in who he is, and money simply didn't come into the equation. In the ten years since, we have had kids, and he has grown his career, while I let mine go to be with the kids (it's impossible to half-ass a career in advertising). For all of those 'judgers' out there...for some women, being home each day to hear each peep their little ones make may not be enough. I love my kids more than life itself....but I still have/need my own, personal challenges while I'm indeed still living. Finding the perfect middle-ground is now what our family is looking for. But, this is our own personal challenge. We are all different. Some women are thrilled with being home all day...as are some men. So be it. It is nobody's business but theirs.
At the end of the day, I'd like to see a lot less judgement by our society of other people. Mothers, fathers, gays, immigrants...you have it.
Live and let live, people.
@USAF Vet: I think what my post says about me is that I'm logical. I'll tell you why it makes a difference. In my personal situation, I've been saving for retirement since I was 18. I've also had a great career, so I own a couple of houses and I have assets. I like to travel and I like to get massages every week and I like to go to high-end restaurants. If I date someone making 1/3 of what I do... how are they going to share my interests? Because I can tell you I'm not paying for both of us. There's a reason I've been working 60 - 80 hours a week for 20 years... and it isn't to give someone a free ride.
Maybe it's an exercise in futility to try to explain my point. Women in my position are frequently quite different than a woman who chooses to get married and stay home with children. We have different priorities and have a very low tolerance for BS from someone we're dating.
The truth is that it's not just income that creates a small dating pool for me - it's primarily because men who are in the same position I am WANT stay at home wives - it's a status symbol. They also want dinner on the table and a clean house and to play that traditional role. What the vast majority do NOT want is a woman who is their equal in income, intelligence, drive, etc. It's too threatening for them. And truly, I am saying this from personal experience over the last 10 years.
(Not trying to be confrontational and apologize if it comes off that way.)
Those are fair enough answers from your perspective, but IMHO you continue to pigeon hole people with them. There's pragmatic and then there's elitist.
What makes you so sure the VAST majority of men who make good money are threatened by a equal partner...or a partner who makes more?
What makes you so sure that they want a status symbol v. a loving wife...perhaps a loving wife (or husband) is a status symbol nowadays?
What makes you so sure that your priorities and BS level tolerance is any different from a women who opts stay at home and have children? Life and love have a peculiar way of changing peoples minds about things.
This is quite a set of labels for quite a large group of people. Even in 10 years, you can't have dated or even met the vast majority of them. Same goes for the men who make under whatever the required income level is to be considered worthy.
I can understand a certain amount of pride or contentment at being successful...and a certain amount of caution for your own wellbeing, but to catagorically rule out a relationship based on a person's income...because you don't want to "carry" them, or you automatically assume that they are trying to take advantage of you or are jealous of you....then well, let's just say if that's your going in position, it's no wonder that things don't work out better.
If I date someone making 1/3 of what I do... how are they going to share my interests?
Princess,
That explains a lot. If your interests are ones that require spending lots of money, then I can see your dilemma.
My interests are reading, writing, playing the piano, biking, etc. Pretty low cost stuff. As a result, I can date just about anyone and be perfectly happy and confident that they aren't trying to fleece me.
I don't think the men who make your kind of money are looking for a stay at home wife for status reasons. I think it's a simple matter of necessity. If a guy has the type of time consuming career that usually accompanies pulling down 200K, he would almost need a home maker to raise a family. Having two people who are both dedicated to their careers would make raising the kids tough.
And truthfully, I don't know too many guys who want to marry a person of lesser intelligence. Looks fade. Brains are forever.
Just to clarify I am not a stay at home mom, I have a career, three beautiful children, one adoring husband who happens to make less than I do. But, funny enough, we share common interests. Mainly they are our children at this point but we connect on so many levels. I remember when I was younger saying that it was so sad to see "old" married couples sitting at dinner and not saying anything to each other. Now I know that isn't sad, it's that they are so comfortable with each other that it doesn't need to be said! They are communicating on a totally different level, at least for me and my husband we are! Don't assume people who get married and have children are any less driven in their careers, it just gets diverted a little with football practice, cheerleading, baseball, basketball................................
The question is silly but the issue is interesting to discuss. I would like to say that what we need to address is the school day and teh chidlcare costs. I am pretty much the only breadwinner for my 2 girls. Their dad left and since he makes little he has almost nothing to give to us. 25% of my net income goes to childcare so that even though i have agood job, we are still broke. Also...the school day is insane. Working mowne don't get free public school ike everyone else. I pay over $3,000 to my daughter's school for before/after care and my work hours are short compared to corporate women (I work 8;30-4:30 for the govt). If I dropped her off and picked her up according to school hours, I would have 10-3 to work. You can't support a family or find such a job. The schools need to understand that women work and adjust their hours. We can't leave a kid waiting for a bus in the freezing cold by the side of the road or going home to an empty house alone. It's abusive and totally unsafe.
Sorry to hear about your situation.
I have a number of female friends that have also dated deadbeats and although we tried to warn them they continued. Fortunately, neither had children that complicated the matter. Specific to their case only, I implore women to make good choices when dating to reduce the chances of your situation.
And I would expect the men in our world to start "manning up" and commit to both your girl and especially your children. I could not imagine not being there for mine every day let alone seldom or never.
I would love it if my wife made more than me--then we'd both be making more together. See the bond is something of a team, at least that is how I was raised to see marriage. Heck I'd love it if she made so much I could be a stay at home dad once we have kids, but she's in social services so that isn't ever going to happen! But as it is I make more than her,by about 30% and both of our paychecks go into a joint account. So who's paying what bills?! It doesn't matter because we're a family. It would probably irk some of the angry men to no end to learn that between the two of us, she's actually the more budget-minded one. But given the current environment when we first started filing joint taxes the CPA put my name as primary even though I just answered simple questions and my wife was sitting there with a folder all tabbed and organized...
I'm sure the angry chauvanists will respond that I'm brow beaten (or perhaps use more crude terms). If that's how you rationalize your contentious relationships, or your dominance over what should be your "partner" then so be it.
See Savage Princess and DSW above for their twist, love of money is what it sounds like , on why they would never date you, or me for that matter even if we were single.
Overall, more power should go to women worldwide but we know how well that is going.
Work hard, play fair and be respectful to your spouse.
@CapnJohnSmith: love of money? No. Someone's ability to share my interests - definitely. If you want to focus on money though, for money's sake, generally people are stupid when making decisions that impact their money and their financial well-being when it comes to love. People generally don't protect themselves from financial ruin following a divorce. I have both a male friend and a female friend who are prime examples of this. Naturally, I would never allow that to happen to me. And neither should anyone else.
Those women that scream 'any man that has a problem with this...) should have their hypocrisy pointed out to them, forthwith. When a woman makes more money than a man, she exerts unfair and hypocritical control over the relationship and looks at the funds as 'her money'. When a man makes more money, the feminists make certain he exerts NO control in any manner of speaking and she looks at his money as 'their money'. If gender equality were not such a one-way sham, men would more easily embrace the notion. Since the reality of the situation is generally as I have described, men have 'had it' with the baloney slicing regarding 'gender equality'. Everywhere he looks he sees and hears women blather on about gender equality, yet when the rubber hits the road, the only time gender equality is exercised is when it is to her advantage; her money, her job, her promotions, her issues, her this and her that; this is the reality of it. This is not going to fly. Gender equality means just that; not superiority.
As long as the family income is sufficient to pay bills (and save some), I don't see any problem. However, loss of one out of two incomes may cause a serious dent in the family finances and that may lead to bickering over money and marital discord. Both spouses need to be big hearted and determined not to let money matters injure the marriage. Things usually get better but sometimes a complete re-orientation of the husband's career may be needed.
Totally accurate Inayat... My husband had an hourly wage as water delivery. He was happy just bringing home a little something into the pot for a while... though he's very smart and does our investing account management. He realized he didn't want to "haul water and salt" til he retired, so he has gone back to school for GIS - something I never would have pegged him for after knowing him for close to 20 years.
And, though I'm jealous he's back in school (I would be a lifelong student if I could get away with it), I did tell him to just quit the job. Go for it. We'll adjust the finances to my single income - because whether he gets a job in his field when he retires - or goes back to work at Blockbuster while looking for GIS work, it will have made him happy, and we are a team that could adjust.
Men have been reduced to manual labor by the women who decided that a mans decision wasnt good enough. Iv meet very very very few wives who thought their men were capable of making a good decision, my wife included. Its the same in the workplace in that even women dont like working for women, why would that be now?
Why would you marry someone who thinks you can't make a good decision? The problem here is that some couples really should not marry.
This was a poorly worded question.......what if I am the primary breadwinner (and I am the husband) but I don't have any problem if my wife became the primary breadwinner? There is no way to answer the question as such!!! Read the yes answers......they all assume the primary breadwinner is the woman already!
I'm with you Jobo. I am the husband, and and the sole breadwinner mostly through a series of life events, but if the roles were reversed I'd be completely fine. The answers are only "women are the primary breadwinner" or, "the women isn't a primary bread winner and I have some issue with it". I would have voted "my wife is not the bread winner but would be fine if she were".
No one is thinking of the kids here. My mother worked, but she also was there when I got home from school. I didn't go to a daycare when I was a kid. It is so much different now. Kids are being raised by other people while Mom and Dad both are more concerned with their lifestyle of SUVs and big houses and how much money they have in the bank.
I think you're assuming that most households that have dual incomes, do so out of choice. The fact is, it was easier for families to live on one income years ago, than it is now. Most couples I know require two incomes to pay the mortgage, etc. Much of this can also be attributed to regions of the country and where you live. I live in the northeast and can tell you, most people cannot afford home purchases on one income. Do not assume everyone is indulging in luxury spending.
Another factor to be considered is, what if a woman chooses to become educated and work? Men have been working, getting married and having children since the beginning of time. Where is there a law written, that prevents women from doing the same? Wanting to have a career does not make a woman less of a mother; time for men to step up to the plate and get further involved in the lives of their children. Most men I know happily do so. They are as active in parenting, as their wives and their children are so much better for it. Men and women should be working as a team...earning enough to support their families and keep them safe. At the same time, it's best when they're both available to spend time off with their children as a family. It gives the children a better sense of balance and the parents a greater sense of satisfaction and happiness. Neither sex should be viewed as a paycheck.
I WANT my daughter to see that she can work if she wants and still be a decent person, wife if she wants to be, mother if she wants to be...
We ARE raising our daughter, not the daycare. I am the enforcer in our house, my husband is the advisor. He's too scared to spank her (afraid he'll hurt her). But we still encourage her, discipline her, mentor her and love her as a team. She sees this respectful and loving relationship. She'll WANT that for herself in her relationships. She's LIVING the Golden Rule, and my having a career and my husband going to school to get a better paying career have ABSOLUTELY no impact on who we are as people or our overriding priority to have a healthy and loving life with our family and friends.
Think outside the borders of your own lives, people. I had a mother that was not physically affectionate (very, very few hugs, kisses, cuddles after 4 years old)... but I KNEW she loved me. She would die or kill for me and she didn't take any crap from anyone that tried to hurt me (including my skip out father that called at 2am on my b-day because he managed to remember it after coming home from the bar).
Children understand love a lot more deeply than any adults ever give them credit for.
My having a job/career and my husband going to school/work would never impact her perception of how loved and wanted she is and how DESERVING of love and respect she should feel.
you're right. I'm lucky to make good pay, so can afford to have my husband stay home with the kids, but if I made half of what I'm making now, I don't think we'd make it. We sacrifice a lot as it is, I don't think we could sacrifice more. But then, if we both worked, we'd have day care costs as well, so that would put an even bigger dent in the pay, so it wouldn't make sense to have both of us work for less money. Wow, I don't think i made any sense there.
Right on Orig Sylko!! I'm in a similar position - I had more earning potential because of my degree, so before we even married we planned for my husband to stay home with kids full-time as long as possible. We struggle to keep up & have had to sacrifice, but it is so worth it to see our children grow & thrive!!
Assuming the father can make enough money to take care of the family, who in their right mind would believe it is better for the family for the mother not to be at home to care for the children? Momma working may be better for employers, but not for families.
Again, there's an "if" in there. IF the mother could support the family, why is it better for her to be home than the father?
My husband's income could not support us. It doesn't lessen him at all. And he does housework he never did before (and picked up on his own, I might add) that I was stuck doing for a family of 7 though my whole childhood. THAT is priceless to me.
He's nurturing while still masculine. He's intelligent but still jokes constantly at my daughter's 6 year old level. He seems to be having a LOT of fun being a dad.
Why should I take that away from him if I still get my own cuddles and kisses and hugs and school/art work reviews and time at the park and Chuck E. Cheese and the zoo, etc. and our daughter is happy and I'm happy and he's happy?
Because of human evolution that made the stronger sex the hunter?
We don't have to hunt anymore. Now, we need to examine EBIDTA (EBITDA?), find code errors in Java, balance spreadsheets, get the steamed milk to 120 degrees and any other number of service related duties.
I've never had to kill my own food, neither has he.
And, you know... MOMMA's got a brain in her head and IS still a social creature. Work allows any human to get out of their cave and meet other humans.
Are you saying Momma is only worth conversation at whatever her child's age is at the moment - or living vicariously through the soaps and reality TV? Do you think Momma fulfills her needs for acceptance by shopping with Poppa's money?
I hope you can see how insulting the thought can be when boiled down to the options women would have if the sole caregiver. Marriage is a partnership... and all vested partners deserve the chance at what makes them happy - because it will make the family unit stronger and happier as well.
Keep in mind lady's. Now that the tide is turning on the primary bread winners, So will the custody issue . resent tends demonstrate the new target is career mom's paying child support. CSPIA act of 1998. This is the weapon the system has used against fathers for decades. State and federal incentives on child support is very profitable for local county budgets and even more profitable coming from a career women. In a child support role the case is made the only one parent can be primary caregiver and the other is every other weekend . It comes down to "best interest of the children" . The government has used a well paying career as a weapon to maximize child support orders that generate huge incentives for state and county government. I have worked on and with the child support issue for years and let me tell you it has never been about support for the children ,its always been about CSPIA of 1998 .In closing career mom's paying child support the system and non-for profits will to call you a dead beat as part of the shakedown.
If women want to work that's fine, I'll enjoy the time I don't have to.
This is sexist B.S. Any man who has a problem with this needs psychiatric help.
I don't think men have the problem, read some of savage princess' stuff. I find a lot of women think like her, which is why they, and I, are in the nearly 35% of US adults who have never married, and probably never will.
Keep in mind lady's. Now that the tide is turning on the primary bread winners, So will the custody issue . resent tends demonstrate the new target is career mom's paying child support. CSPIA act of 1998. This is the weapon the system has used against fathers for decades. State and federal incentives on child support is very profitable for local county budgets and even more profitable coming from a career women. In a child support role the case is made the only one parent can be primary caregiver and the other is every other weekend . It comes down to "best interest of the children" . The government has used a well paying career as a weapon to maximize child support orders that generate huge incentives for state and county government. I have worked on and with the child support issue for years and let me tell you it has never been about support for the children ,its always been about CSPIA of 1998 .In closing career mom's paying child support the system and non-for profits will to call you a dead beat as part of the shakedown.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead. (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul) |
Silly question. Does it really still need to be asked? Whoever isn't comfortable with it has problems that they need to address.